Resource

Equity Lens Checklist for Evaluating AI Tools

A reusable tool for evaluating any AI product, feature, or service against the four community concerns libraries hear most.

The checklist's verdict panel — three cards labeled Go, Caution, and Stop, each with a colored status dot, above a list of equity questions to ask an AI vendor.
The verdict step: a Go / Caution / Stop call for the community, alongside the questions to put to a vendor.

One of our new classes for California's CALL Academy is about examining AI with a focus on equity. We examine it through four main lenses: bias/discrimination, access and barriers, environmental impact, and workforce/labor impact.

This tool provides a simple checklist for considering these equity lenses when evaluating a new service, product, or tool. It's not binding or restrictive; it's just a guide to help inform your decision-making.

0 / 11 prompts considered
How to use: Work through each pillar with the tool in front of you. Tick a prompt once you've genuinely considered it — there are no automatic pass/fail thresholds. The “Flag for” line under each pillar surfaces the equity factors most likely to be affected. Finish with a verdict and the vendor questions at the bottom.

Your verdict

Where does this tool land for our community? This is a judgment call — the checklist informs it, it doesn't decide it.

Go
Concerns are minor or well-mitigated. Proceed with normal review.
Caution
Real equity gaps. Proceed only with safeguards, disclosure, or a plan.
Stop
Harm to a group outweighs benefit, or core questions can't be answered.
Questions to ask the vendor
  • What data was this trained on, and who was — or wasn't — represented in it?
  • What does full access cost a patron, including devices, connectivity, and reading level?
  • Can you document accessibility conformance (WCAG) and supported languages?
  • What's your stance on data retention, and can patron data be excluded from training?
  • How were affected workers and communities consulted in the product's design?
equityAI evaluationprocurement

More from PLAID3

Update · May 26, 2026

What we learned running AI Ambassadors in 2026

Reflections from the second cohort of LibraryLinkNJ's AI Ambassadors training series — what changed in two and a half years, and how we teach library staff to teach everyone else.

7 min read
Update · May 25, 2026

Testing a Chinese AI model on sensitive topics

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs pennies on the dollar next to Claude and GPT — but ask it the same five questions and the difference in what it will say becomes obvious.

1 min read

All news →